I have to ask this as I wonder if it might be contributing to some of the
stability problems. The powershot uses pins 7 & 8 for positive and pin 5
for negative. Pin 4 is used for the device reset button. PoE typically
uses two wires for each lead so that the voltage and current drop is
minimal. By only using one wire for the negative lead the voltage and
current drop significantly. In lab conditions, this won't make a huge
difference. However, once temperature is factored in the possible drop on
100 Feet of cable and a 12 volt supply is likely to be below minimal
operational limits. Has all this been considered in the design?
I think that changing the reset button from a normally open type to a
normally closed type and then adding a transistor and probably a diode to
the radio would be more effective. This way the reset wire is always
acting as a negative lead except when performing a reset. The additional
transistor would invert the state of the reset button and provide the
circuit a connection to the additional negative lead.
It's late at night but I think my thoughts are clear. Any ideas, thoughts,
comments?
--Blaine
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
- Re: [smartBridges] PowerShot pinout question Blaine Fleming
- Re: [smartBridges] PowerShot pinout question Eje Gustafsson
- RE: [smartBridges] PowerShot pinout question sB Tech Support
- RE: [smartBridges] PowerShot pinout questio... Jason
- RE: [smartBridges] PowerShot pinout que... Vasu \(sB Tech Team\)
