We are aware of this possibility when we first thought of implementing
Powershot POE with the Reset function. However feedback from the
hardware team and that it was tested with 100m using 1 wire for negative
will not pose a problem at all.

Alex
sB Tech Support
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blaine Fleming
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:57 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [smartBridges] PowerShot pinout question

I have to ask this as I wonder if it might be contributing to some of
the 
stability problems.  The powershot uses pins 7 & 8 for positive and pin
5 
for negative.  Pin 4 is used for the device reset button.  PoE typically

uses two wires for each lead so that the voltage and current drop is 
minimal.  By only using one wire for the negative lead the voltage and 
current drop significantly.  In lab conditions, this won't make a huge 
difference.  However, once temperature is factored in the possible drop
on 
100 Feet of cable and a 12 volt supply is likely to be below minimal 
operational limits.  Has all this been considered in the design?

I think that changing the reset button from a normally open type to a 
normally closed type and then adding a transistor and probably a diode
to 
the radio would be more effective.  This way the reset wire is always 
acting as a negative lead except when performing a reset.  The
additional 
transistor would invert the state of the reset button and provide the 
circuit a connection to the additional negative lead.

It's late at night but I think my thoughts are clear.  Any ideas,
thoughts, 
comments?

--Blaine

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to