I am sure because they are not in the outdoors in the heat? I bet if you put that "indoor unit" outside in direct sunlight it will lock up just like the outdoor units and a LOT sooner too.
just my 2 cents.. You have to compare apples to apples This is a good fix but not feasible trying to fix an existing customer having to run LMR 400 to the new "indoor unit" I even went as far as thinking of doing this with the outdoor units and mounting them inside the attic but it gets even hotter in there I took a temp gauge up there the other day and it measured 125*!!!! when outside it was 105 so as you can see this probably would not have been a good idea.. Martin Quoting John Hokenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What we've done is just switch to the Indoor AP in bridge mode until this > issue has been dealt with. They are not suffering from any of the known > issues. > > JH > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:37 PM > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > > > > Look into reliawave, proxim, or one of the other certified solutions as a > > temporary measure. That's what we're doing. It's going to cost us more > up > > front (trust me, it's more money that we don't really have) but it's > worth > > it to keep clients happy and to keep our installs flowing. We have the > > attitude that for now we are focusing on revenue. We need to get our > client > > base up and keep them on so we (all WISPs) don't get known as unreliable. > > > > Ray > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Martin Moreno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:20 PM > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > > > > > > > Ray, > > > > > > You do have a point but I really dont have any other option financially > to > > > choose from this was it I could start using some Linksys wet 11's but > in > > other > > > forums when I was doing research these seemed to work but also had a > > lockup > > > problem a while back so I decided to go with a known vendor (Smart > > bridges) and > > > I was happy until now. > > > That's part of my sales pitch I use fully qualified outdoor rated > radios > > not > > > cheap store bought stuff and people like the concept I cant go back on > my > > word > > > now hehehe I think if SB had a good R & D process we would not see as > many > > > problems as we do. I think that going forward they or we need to press > > this > > > issue so we don't keep getting caught with our pants down. I offered to > > even > > > devote many hours of my not so free time to help develop this process > and > > even > > > field any tech calls for them once I get more established and not > having > > to do > > > all the work for my WISP with just my partner and I. I think we can > make > > this > > > product really kick some butt, but we have to have the buy in of smart > > bridges > > > and a few key individuals that will be diligent in testing new product > > (BETA) > > > and smart bridges will then use this as valuable input before > implementing > > any > > > final changes and we will help with the approval process. I am sure > there > > are > > > many people that are willing to help with this process such as me and > > those > > > that have some kind of background with working with engineers and > > development > > > people. > > > > > > What are your thoughts?? > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > My concern is that with all we've invested in these products (and I > > really > > > > like them) distributors might start to drop them. Think about it, if > > you > > > > were Ecomm would you want all this hassle? > > > > > > > > I would rather SB recall or at least put a hold on all shipments > until > > they > > > > get this issue fixed. I would rather use another CPE product that > works > > so > > > > I don't look like a dumb a** to my clients by using beta products > that > > > > simply aren't yet ready. > > > > > > > > I would switch back to SB as soon as the units are again working. > > > > > > > > Ray > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Martin Moreno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 8:20 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > firmware? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would agree with that! > > > > > I did not catch what Dist they were getting them from? I get mine > from > > > > ECOMM > > > > > and they have been pretty good for the most part. I dont like the > idea > > of > > > > > having a bad unit and they charge your card for the repalcement > ahead > > of > > > > time > > > > > then refund you when they get the non working one back??? Seems > > backwards > > > > to me > > > > > I pitched a fit and got them to send me an APPO in advance exchange > > liek > > > > their > > > > > warranty clearly states without being charged 1st then charge me if > I > > > > dont > > > > send > > > > > it back within 10 days. This was after I ordered two new APPO's and > > one I > > > > > recieved was a used unit sent back for repair! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting Eje Gustafsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > shrug.. Now I am going to shock this entirely list by finally > > agreeing > > > > > > with Chris.. Can't agree more with what you just said. > > > > > > > > > > > > If they all where bad out of the box or a lot of them where bad > out > > of > > > > > > the box it's the distributor/resellers problem not the > manufacturers > > > > > > if teh distributor or reseller don't want to work with you you > might > > > > > > try to resolve it with the manufacturer if someone gets sued it > > should > > > > > > be the dist not the manufacturer. The manufacturer will not give > you > > a > > > > > > refund. They sold the unit for say $10 and you purchased it for > $20 > > > > > > from the dist so should the manufacturer give you a refund for > $20 > > and > > > > > > lose $10 ??? Come on I think not. If someone should give you a > > refund > > > > > > it's the dist. However if the dist will not work it out then the > > > > > > manufacturer can give you a working replacement. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Eje Gustafsson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > The Family Entertainment Network http://www.fament.com > > > > > > Phone : 620-231-7777 Fax : 620-231-4066 > > > > > > - Your Full Time Professionals - > > > > > > eBay UserID : macahan > > > > > > --- > > > > > > searchable smartBridges mailing list archive. > > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/ > > > > > > -- > > > > > > p> Ok T n T > > > > > > > > > > > > p> WOW Talk about a drastic calling for attention in my view, > most > > of > > > > the > > > > > > p> people on the board are working on resolving problems and your > > > > response > > > > > > toa > > > > > > p> firmware issue is that they are advertised as carrier class > and > > that > > > > > > they > > > > > > p> don't offer cash refunds? Umm does cisco or lucent? If so I'd > > gladly > > > > like > > > > > > to > > > > > > p> get my money back on some AP1000's or CPE Ethernet Converters > and > > a > > > > few > > > > > > p> cisco 350's. A class action suit? Really I have yet to hear > > anyone > > > > that > > > > > > is > > > > > > p> pissed at the fact that they only exchange units in a timely > > manner > > > > and > > > > > > wont > > > > > > p> give them there cash back? Personally I don't recall many > groups > > > > that > > > > > > will > > > > > > p> do cash refunds from the primary company isn't this a point to > > deal > > > > with > > > > > > p> your SUPPLIER if you feel you need to return goods cause you > > don't > > > > want > > > > > > p> them. > > > > > > > > > > > > p> As far as I can tell in the past SB has stood behind there > > problems > > > > > > p> including phone calls from half way across the world at 10am > to > > help > > > > > > solve > > > > > > p> MANY users problems in a one on one basis, they take > suggestions > > and > > > > work > > > > > > to > > > > > > p> help mold there product. Really you have invested 6,000$ wow I > > have > > > > > > spent > > > > > > p> over 25,000 upgrading my network with SB's powering it and i > have > > > > yet > > > > to > > > > > > p> find a reason to neglect the funds spent. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > p> AS A NOTE IT SAYS > > > > > > > > > > > > p> DOA Products must be returned in original condition, and the > > return > > > > box > > > > > > must > > > > > > p> include all components and originally packaged with the > product, > > > > > > including > > > > > > p> cable, software, manual, etc. You must obtain an RMA number > > before > > > > you > > > > > > p> return any defective or DOA products. > > > > > > > > > > > > p> REQUIRES ORIGINAL BOX ON DOA UNITS... DOA MEANS DEAD ON > ARRIVAL > > > > HENCE > > > > > > YOU > > > > > > p> JUST GOT IT SO THEY WANT IT BACK HOW THEY SENT IT SINCE IT WAS > > DEAD > > > > AS > > > > > > SOON > > > > > > p> AS YOU GOT IT. > > > > > > > > > > > > p> As for the returning on a one to one basis it is not FINE > PRINT > > it > > > > is > > > > > > p> blatantly shown in Standard Sized text under the warranty > > > > conditions. > > > > > > Not > > > > > > p> like they used size 1 font to try to hide it from you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > p> Sorry if I'm being a di*k but this is just my take on your > > comment. > > > > > > > > > > > > p> Chris > > > > > > p> -----Original Message----- > > > > > > p> From: Tom & Toni Maris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > p> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 10:44 PM > > > > > > p> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > p> My husband Tom is very pissed. We have invested more than > > $6,000.00 > > > > in > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > p> gear and we are constantly having prtoblems. > > > > > > p> On their web site thwy claim to be Carrier Class. Now we read > the > > > > fine > > > > > > print > > > > > > > > > > > > p> on the rmapage and it says they will not give refund just > > > > replacement > > > > > > units > > > > > > p> and that you have to have the original box! > > > > > > p> Original box, replacement unit's, no refunds, Carrier class. > > > > > > p> This SmartBridges company certainly does not sound like an > honest > > > > > > company. > > > > > > p> First I would like to know where they get off saying anything > > about > > > > > > Carrier > > > > > > p> class. > > > > > > p> Then if they are so sure about their Carrier class junk, why > do > > you > > > > need > > > > > > an > > > > > > p> original box to sned them back, and why don't they do refunds? > > > > > > > > > > > > p> Tom, has been talking about a lawsuite to make this > Smartbridge > > > > company > > > > > > p> stand behind their products or give everyone their money back. > He > > > > thinks > > > > > > > > > > > > p> that their is probably enough people like us who got ripped > off > > to > > > > get a > > > > > > > > > > > > p> class action lawsuite against the company who sold us this > pile > > of > > > > junk > > > > > > > > > > > > p> Very very disapointed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > p> T n T > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>From: "Blazen Wireless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > > > firmware? > > > > > > >>Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:03:47 -0700 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Okay so it appears I am not the only one having the problem > here > > We > > > > hav > > > > > > >>users at begining at 3.5 miles and some as far as 7.2 miles the > > last > > > > > > >>revision 0.01.06 just will not associate to any of my APS I had > > > > sugested > > > > > > >>there is something going on here and I am finally able to get > on > > this > > > > > > list > > > > > > >>and post only to see what I have been telling support since > last > > week > > > > > > >>before > > > > > > >>the release only to be told its been working well in the "LAB" > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Here is my post from another forum these things need to be > tested > > in > > > > a > > > > > > >>consistant manor not just really close up. > > > > > > >>1. Measure signal at 1, 2, 3, 4,5 ,6 and 7 miles if possible > > > > > > >>2. At each point do some speed tests to confirm it is working > and > > how > > > > > > well > > > > > > >>or how bad as you can see at some ares out we get association > but > > > > speeds > > > > > > >>are > > > > > > >>WAY down. > > > > > > >>These are only 2 that need to be added to the list of testing > > before > > > > ANY > > > > > > >>final revision is released to save time and nerves of those of > us > > in > > > > the > > > > > > >>field! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>I keep asking what is the closest and farthest they have been > > tested > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > >>"LAB" and I have yet to get an answer? is this something that > is > a > > > > > > secret?? > > > > > > >>I too am not going to change firmware on the APPOS that are > > working > > > > rock > > > > > > >>solid and have ALL my customers down. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> We have tried it (ver 0.01.06 rev 3 final release )and I have > > seen > > > > > > >>problems > > > > > > >>but to be fair we still need to identify if this firmware is > > > > compatible > > > > > > >>with > > > > > > >>the OLD atmel chip they had. We tried this new firmware on the > > only > > > > radio > > > > > > > > > > > > >>we > > > > > > >>have left since the other 2 locked up hardcore and are now > > doorstops > > > > > > after > > > > > > >>doing firmware upgrades with rev 2 & rev 3 just before the > final > > > > release. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Here is what we found after 3 hours of testing and we found the > > same > > > > > > thing > > > > > > >>on rev 2 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>I don't how you guys feel about it and maybe this firmware is > not > > > > > > >>compatible > > > > > > >>with the old good atmel chip per say. > > > > > > >>The two test radios that locked up we just bought less then a > > month > > > > ago so > > > > > > > > > > > > >>I > > > > > > >>can only assume they had the problem. Unless they can come up > with > > a > > > > way > > > > > > to > > > > > > >>positively identify which units are suspect with the suspect > chip. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>I suggest you do the same tests with a spare radio that you can > > > > afford > > > > to > > > > > > >>lose if the firmware upgrade goes bad. Basically what happens > is > > the > > > > > > radio > > > > > > >>locks up and it no longer gives an Ethernet connection to log > into > > > > the > > > > > > >>radio, the power and wireless light stay on solid and you no > > longer > > > > get a > > > > > > >>LAN connection or light many times I was told to reset and > don't > > see > > > > how > > > > > > >>that would work since that just resets passwords and the IP > > address > > > > etc > > > > > > but > > > > > > >>I tried 20 times anyways they even sent me a utility to unlock > it > > but > > > > > > that > > > > > > >>was useless because you need a network connection to the radio > > > > hahaha. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Anyways in a nut shell the firmware after testing as you can > see > > in > > > > our > > > > > > >>notes does not work for us yet Smart bridges claims it works > well > > in > > > > the > > > > > > >>lab > > > > > > >>and others have tested as well which I would like to know how > far > > > > away > > > > > > they > > > > > > >>tested the radio. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>1. ver 0.01.04 loaded originally on this unit and at 3.5 miles > we > > > > > > associate > > > > > > >>fine and get download speeds in 900kbps to 1.2 megs > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>2. Loaded ver 0.01.06 final rev into radio it loads fine and at > > same > > > > 3.5 > > > > > > >>mile location we get not even half the speeds we did with rev > > 0.01.04 > > > > we > > > > > > >>get > > > > > > >>200kbps to 300kbps at most and have lots of packet loss. > > > > > > >>RSSI 85% and signal quality 90-95% with both firmware. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>3. Moved to 5 mile location ran same speed tests with firmware > > > > 0.01.04 > > > > > > get > > > > > > >>speeds of 800kbps consistently loaded ver 0.01.06 final > revision > > and > > > > we > > > > > > >>associate but thats it radio will not ping APPO on tower but we > > can > > > > ping > > > > > > >>ABO > > > > > > >>radio with new firmware. RSSI 80% signal quality 80% with both > > > > firmware. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>So as you can see this firmware will not work for us. I don't > > > > understand > > > > > > >>what happened it seems that this is now possibly a timing > issue? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>The only question I have is will version 0.01.06 work on old > > radios > > > > with > > > > > > >>old > > > > > > >>atmel chip? and if not then we will proceed further to load the > > > > 0.01.06 > > > > > > on > > > > > > >>clients radios but once again we have no way of telling which > > radios > > > > have > > > > > > >>new or old atmel chip? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Our coverage area begins at 3.5 miles and runs > > > > > > >>out to 7.2 miles. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > >>From: "Colorado Wisp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:18 PM > > > > > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > > > firmware? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Nish, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>We updated several of one of our "overheating" units this > morning > > and > > > > it > > > > > > >>will not associate with our APs running 1.4j.5. We have no > plans > > to > > > > > > update > > > > > > >>the firmware on the APs, they have been rock solid. Is there > > going > > > > to > > > > be > > > > > > >>firmware that will interact this firmware version? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Chris > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>--- > > > > > > >>Colorado WISP llc. http://www.cowisp.net > > > > > > >>Bringing high speed internet to rural communities. > > > > > > >>P.O. Box 55 > > > > > > >>Wellington, Colorado 80549 > > > > > > >>970-218-5295 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > > > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >>On Behalf Of Nish Park > > > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 2:49 AM > > > > > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > > > firmware? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Tim, > > > > > > >>Can you please elaborate a little more on this "still doing the > > same > > > > > > >>thing!". What was the problem, new unit (June or July > purchase?), > > > > RSSI > > > > > > and > > > > > > >>LQ values, Brand of AP? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>We have confirmed that the problem of loosing association at > > elevated > > > > > > >>temperature has been solved. This has been the focus of all our > > > > efforts > > > > > > and > > > > > > >>we are quire confident that issue no longer exist. Now we will > be > > > > > > focusing > > > > > > >>on testing if there has been any other side effects. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >From some of the emails it appears that some of you are > trying > > to > > > > see > > > > > > >> >if > > > > > > >>the new F/W also fixes the old/lingering problem of "periodic > > > > lockup". > > > > I > > > > > > >>will be pleasantly surprised to hear that it does, but that has > > not > > > > been > > > > > > >>the > > > > > > >>focus of the current activity on hand. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Thanks for your support. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Nish > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > > > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >>On Behalf Of Tim Harris > > > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:32 PM > > > > > > >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > > > firmware? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Yep, I installed it this afternoon on a client's unit. Had to > > unplug > > > > it > > > > > > to > > > > > > >>get it to start working after uploading the new firmware. > Started > > > > > > working > > > > > > >>fine. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Customer called back an hour later and left two messages, still > > doing > > > > the > > > > > > >>same thing! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>If it smells like it, if it looks like it........ > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Hmm, maybe the guy with the Hotmail address might have a point. > > This > > > > > > seems > > > > > > >>to be getting ridiculous. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>I'm doing two more tomorrow morning, I'll post a response > then.. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Tim Harris, Operations > > > > > > >>www.dwisp.net > > > > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > >>From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > >>Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:09 AM > > > > > > >>Subject: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > firmware? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Has anyone installed the new firmware? I'm getting ready to > > try, > > > > but > > > > > > >> > wanted to check first to see what sort of luck others have > had. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Thanks > > > > > > >> > Sam > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > > > >> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > subscribe > > > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> > > > > > > >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > > > unsubscribe > > > > > > >>smartBridges) > > > > > > >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > subscribe > > > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > (in > > > > > > the > > > > > > >>body type unsubscribe > > > > > > >>smartBridges) > > > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > subscribe > > > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > (in > > > > > > the > > > > > > >>body type unsubscribe smartBridges) > > > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > subscribe > > > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> > > > > > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > unsubscribe > > > > > > >>smartBridges) > > > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > subscribe > > > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> > > > > > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > unsubscribe > > > > > > >>smartBridges) > > > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > > > > > > p> > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > p> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* > > > > > > p> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > > > > > > > > > > p> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > > > p> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > subscribe > > > > > > p> smartBridges <yournickname> > > > > > > p> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > unsubscribe > > > > > > p> smartBridges) > > > > > > p> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > > > > > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > > smartBridges > > > > > > <yournickname> > > > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > unsubscribe > > > > > > smartBridges) > > > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin Moreno > > > > > Blazen Wireless > > > > > 909-907-4106 > > > > > www.blazenwireless.com > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > unsubscribe > > > > smartBridges) > > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/11/2003 > > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > smartBridges > > > > <yournickname> > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > > > smartBridges) > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin Moreno > > > Blazen Wireless > > > 909-907-4106 > > > www.blazenwireless.com > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > smartBridges) > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/11/2003 > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges > <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > Martin Moreno Blazen Wireless 909-907-4106 www.blazenwireless.com The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
