THere is no law that require you to keep track of who is who. However in certain states NAT is considered illegal to use to conceal the origin of a transmission.
Best regards, Eje Gustafsson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Family Entertainment Network http://www.fament.com Phone : 620-231-7777 Fax : 620-231-4066 - Your Full Time Professionals - eBay UserID : macahan --- searchable smartBridges mailing list archive. http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/ -- cxc> I don't believe there is any law requiring this either. If this were an actual cxc> law, using NAT would be illegal since it effectively hides the IP address of cxc> the originating machine. cxc> Craig cxc> Quoting Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I don't believe there is any law that requires this in the US. If there >> is, >> please post the citation. >> >> Ray >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 6:24 PM >> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] DHCP vs static >> >> >> > How long do these records have to (by law) be maintained? >> > >> > Sam >> > >> > On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Blazen Wireless wrote: >> > >> > > by law you have to keep records of who is on your system IE.by IP >> address. >> > > 66.80.111.11 belongs to bill .22 belongs to Sara etc etc so if for some >> > > reason they OHH lets send a treat to the president and the authorities >> come >> > > looking and they ask who has what IP you have a list to give them get >> it.. >> > > >> > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:58 PM >> > > Subject: [smartBridges] DHCP vs static >> > > >> > > >> > > >Plus if any johnny law comes around asking who has what IP I >give >> > > >them my little excell list with names to Ip on it and I am out >of the >> > > loop >> > > >hopefully.. >> > > > >> > > >-M >> > > >> > > >> > > Huh??? >> > > >> > > Tim Foster >> > > www.AledoBroadBand.com >> > > Aledo's only high-speed ISP >> > > >> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >> > > smartBridges <yournickname> >> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >> > > smartBridges) >> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > >> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >> smartBridges <yournickname> >> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >> smartBridges) >> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > >> > >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >> smartBridges <yournickname> >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >> smartBridges) >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > >> >> >> --- >> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >> Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 7/20/2003 >> >> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges >> <yournickname> >> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >> smartBridges) >> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> >> cxc> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List cxc> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> cxc> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) cxc> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
