Same here - going to climb a water tower in 102 degree heat to reset an APPO
that was REPLACED Thursday night.  I only have one business customer right
now and they are the ones affected - can you say "loss of business"?

Gloria

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bobby Bounds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB


> Gloria,
>
> I'm going up on a roof right now to replace an APPO that crapped out
(read:
> won't pass traffic) after being up just two weeks. I'm not hopeful
however,
> because my only spare came from the same batch. It too, will likely behave
> the same.
>
> SB, you really screwed the pooch on this one by not recalling the entire
run
> of bad units. Gloria, the problem is the radios.
>
> Bobby Bounds
> Airwave Internet, LLC
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gloria Vester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 1:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB
>
>
> > Can you tell me where to find the list of MAC addresses that are being
> > recalled?  I am working on my RMAs now and I have a feeling that all
five
> of
> > the units I have are from the same batch.  When I asked them how many of
> my
> > units to RMA, they said it was up to me and my "comfort level".  I don't
> > want to bash SB either - it is counter productive, and they are being
very
> > supportive in trying to help.  But at the same time, I agree with you
that
> > it would have been more cost effective to have just recalled and
replaced
> > all the units that were suspect and saved themselves a lot of bad
> publicity
> > and us a lot of lost revenue.
> >
> > I have had it pointed out to me from several different sources on this
> list
> > that the problem is more than likely not with the airPoints, that is
> > probably a power issue or an environmental issue.  I am not ruling that
> out
> > completely, and am continuing to investigate all possibilities.  But if
it
> > were something that we did wrong in our design and installation, why is
my
> > Trango backhaul working perfectly using the same power source, the same
> > cabling, the same switch, in the same temperature environment?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gloria
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "The Wirefree Network" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 1:47 PM
> > Subject: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB
> >
> >
> > > I am feeling a bit guilty for hammering sB so badly...but it is there
> > > fault after all.  They could have resolved this a long time ago.
> > >
> > > Here is the explanation as given to me from them (simplified version):
> > > In June there were 2 production lines putting together sB equipment.
> > > One with bad chips, one with good chips.  My use of "bad chips" is my
> > > own.  They call it "timing issue" chips.
> > >
> > > Prior to getting stamped with MAC addresses, the units are brought
back
> > > together on one line and stamped.  Therefore, there is NO way to say
> > > exactly which units have the "bad chips".
> > >
> > > This is why sB is not recalling the entire series of MAC
> > > addresses...there are a bunch of good ones mixed in there as well.
> > >
> > > You may be thinking the same thing I am right now....hmmmm....why
> > > wouldn't they just go ahead and recall the whole batch??  Hindsight,
> > > they would probably have saved a lot of money in lost revenue from the
> > > bad publicity.  And it would have MOST definitely saved us a TON of
> > > money, and therefore retained their good reputation from us.
> > >
> > > Bottomline:  They are doing direct RMA's for all the bad June/July
> > > units.  Just talk to them.  We are all bitching for good reason...but
> > > just do the RMA.  It is all we can do.  Then hope they are really
> > > sending us good stuff this time.
> > >
> > > Sully
> > >
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
>
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>


The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to