see, if I say that, people would correctly figure that my life is an experiment and they'll try to take me back to the lab!!!
I won't go back!!! I won't go back!!!!
;-)
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 10:20, Blazen Wireless wrote:
how about life's full of little EXPERIMENTS or life IS an EXPERIMENT? HEHEH
----- Original Message -----
From: Sevak Avakians
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 6:02 AM
Subject: RE: RE: [smartBridges] Fragmentation
Sully, I for one agree with you!
I doubt that anyone will encounter a situation where Frag needs to be set so low. At worst it will drag the network to a crawl.
If I remember correctly -and I usually don't- I think the original intent behind the default setting for Frag has something to do with the packet sizes that pass through switches and routers.
BTW, I think I'm going to make my motto "EXPERIMENT!". I like the ring to it. And it takes care of needing to come up with a real answer to anything. Hmmm... That's what I'll tell my customers to do from now on when the network goes down. I'm sure this will work out fine!
;-)
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:10, The Wirefree Network wrote:
The point is just that....Let the client handle it.
There is NO need to further fragment the wireless packets unless for
some reason it improves your LQ.
Don't forget that if you step down the frag threshold below 1500, then
something has to buffer those packets as they are being chopped up. I
don't see any reason to lower the threshold below 1496 (which
effectively is doing nothing).
Of course...someone will try to prove me wrong.
Sully
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blazen Wireless
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: [smartBridges] Fragmentation
Yes but whets the point if setting to that if the client cant handle
that??
----- Original Message -----
From: "sB Tech Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:33 PM
Subject: RE: RE: [smartBridges] Fragmentation
As stipulated in RFC3580, 2346 is the maxiumum frame length for 802.11.
Arasu
sB Tech Support
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Breiland, Derek
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 3:26 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: RE: [smartBridges] Fragmentation
Just curious as to what SmartBridges reasoning is for the default
setting for fragmentation in the AP. Before I go making any changes I
would sure like to hear what they have to say. There has to be some
kind of reasoning behind it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: [smartBridges] Fragmentation
You will have to set it on the AP and the client devices.
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Derek Breiland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:57:32 -0600
>Is this a negotiated setting meaning if you change the AP it will be
negotiated with the CPE and will operate this way without changing the
CPE setting?
>
>Does anyone have anymore details as to what the benefits are of doing
>this?
Will this improve the link as in signal percentage or throughput?
>>
>> Try 2346 instead.
>>
>> Kevin Summers
>> KISTech Internet Services Inc.
>> www.kistech.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Blazen Wireless
>> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:18 AM
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Fragmentation
>> >
>> >
>> > I thought it was 2347 but that does not work on the fragmentation
>> > it says it is not valid I do see it allows you to use 2347 on the
>> > RTS so I am not sure
>> > on how to turn off fragmentation..
>> >
>> > You are correct someone did mention it on this forum cant remember
>> > who though..
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Jeremy Oswalt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:33 AM
>> > Subject: [smartBridges] Fragmentation
>> >
>> >
>> > I heard someone mention that they turned off fragmentation at the
>> > APPO
and
>> > set the RTS on the clients to 256 to improve links. How do you
>> > turn
off
>> > fragmentation at the APPO?
>> >
>> > _____
>> >
>> > Jeremy
>> >
>> > _____
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
>> > Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
>> > http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
>> >
>> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
>> > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > (in the body type unsubscribe
>> > smartBridges)
>> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>> >
>> >
>> > ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
>> > Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
>> > http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
>> >
>> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
>> > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
>> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>>
>> ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
>> Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
>> http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
>>
>> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
>> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
>> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
>Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
>http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
>
>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>---
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]
>
>
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]
----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
|
