I would have thought you'd still want your corporate customers to log on using PPPoE using an ADSL router sitting between their CPE and LAN - but with a profile configured to suit their particular needs. All other users use a different (default) profile.
To get a definitive answer though, ask Eje (not Jeeves!) - he's the MikroTik guru. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Ellison Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] NetBSD Traffic Shaping / PPPoE Will Mikrotik allow me to have one interface for answering PPPoE requests, while at the same time having another interface for routing dedicated IP's (non-pppoe, straight IP) to my corporate clients? I need to be able to shape traffic in both instances. Andrew Watkins wrote: >Try the MikroTik RouterOS for free by downloading a fully functional >trial version from http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html. Also make >sure you download the manual. > >IMHO I think at $45 RouterOS is worth every penny - or cent for you >guys across the pond ;-). Within an hour it's paid for itself. > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Behalf Of Ian Ellison >Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:52 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [smartBridges] NetBSD Traffic Shaping / PPPoE > >Anyone out there running this setup? If so, could you point me to some >documentation or give me an idea of what i need to use to do traffic >shaping and setup PPPoE server with NetBSD 1.6? I'm 100% comfortable >in Linux using iptables, and had been using HTB for my traffic shaping. >However, it seems that there is no good FREE PPPoE server for Linux, >and I've heard good things about the NetBSD implementation, so I'm >considering going that route. I thought about using Mikrotik, but I'm >familiar enough with what it is doing on the kernel level to setup the >same type of system myself without paying for the RouterOS, although I >would be interested to know what PPPoE server they run on Mikrotik. >Thanks for any suggestions. > >Ian > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges ><yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >unsubscribe smartBridges) >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges ><yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >unsubscribe smartBridges) >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
