yep, for sure the same applies to compression and probably other
settings. but i whouldnt touch checksumming, never.

Am 17.06.2015 um 12:55 schrieb Perttu:
> What about compression and checksumming? Those also seem redundant
> inside the guest and could be turned off for better performance.
> 
> -Perttu
> 
> On 17 Jun 2015 at 13:49:30, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter
> ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:
> 
>> With with default Settings you will end up in Caching everything twice
>> with ZFS inside the Guest.
>>
>> Either use some regular, legacy FS or change primary/secondarycache to
>> Metadata only
>>
>> Am 17.06.2015 um 12:20 schrieb David Finster:
>> > Hi Perttu
>> >  
>> > We don’t run any Linux inside KVMs, but we do run a fair amount of
>> > Windows. In general, your right in that running ZFS inside a KVM isn’t
>> > going to get you any benefit and would probably be detrimental. It is
>> > worth noting that all writes from inside a KVM are considered
>> > synchronous anyway as far as the ‘zones’ pool is concerned. Any writes
>> > that your guest does will be immediately committed to some disk (hence
>> > the importance of an SLOG).
>> >  
>> > ZFS snapshots are consistent when created, but I guess there is the
>> > potential for some application inside the VM to have writes outstanding
>> > when a snapshot is taken (through queued IO?). If that were the case,
>> > then you would need some mechanism of notifying the application that
>> > it’s about to be snapped to be completely safe.
>> >  
>> > That being said, anything that uses a proper transaction log should be
>> > fine. I’ve done snapshots of SQL and Exchange servers and
>> > migrations/test emergency restores have been fine. Doing a snapshot of a
>> > live VM and then bringing it up on another host is similar to it
>> > experiencing a power failure, which is what the transaction logs are
>> > designed to handle.  
>> >  
>> > As Ian mentioned, you might also be better off giving LX zones a go -
>> > they are much friendlier to the host and no additional file systems are
>> > involved.  
>> >  
>> > - Dave
>> >  
>> >> On 17 Jun 2015, at 8:00 PM, Perttu <[email protected]
>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello SmartOS community, long time follower, first time poster here.
>> >>
>> >> What do you guys think are best practices regarding file systems in
>> >> KVM Linux guests?
>> >>
>> >> Is it advisable to use ZFS inside guests? Wouldn’t it use double the
>> >> memory for the same data?
>> >>
>> >> Or would using something like XFS or ext4 be better and perhaps tuning
>> >> them to be more synchronous if crash resiliency is wanted?
>> >>
>> >> My main concern is data integrity if I snapshot and send the guest
>> >> regularly to another host for disaster recovery. Performance is also
>> >> important but I do have a slog device (S3700).
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Perttu
>> >> *smartos-discuss* | Archives
>> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now>
>> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25738179-216c4b5f>
>> >> | Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>> >> [Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com/>
>> >>
>> >  
>> > *smartos-discuss* | Archives
>> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now>
>> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/26910370-9cc4a721> |
>> > Modify
>> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
>> > Your Subscription  [Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com>
>> >  
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>> smartos-discuss
>> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
>> RSS Feed:
>> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/27159464-c7cd6100
>> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
> *smartos-discuss* | Archives
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/26910370-9cc4a721> |
> Modify
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
> Your Subscription     [Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com>
> 


-------------------------------------------
smartos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to