On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Chris Ferebee via smartos-discuss < [email protected]> wrote:
> > Therefore, write-endurance and power-loss protection are essential for a > ZIL device. OTOH, if the ZIL fails, the system should keep running, just > with reduced sync write performance. So you only need to mirror the ZIL if > you can’t tolerate a drop in performance for the time it takes to provision > a new ZIL device. > Won't you lose data if you lose a ZIL? Presumably everything stored on it at failure time would be lost, right? I also vaguely recall that we've had problems with pools where the ZIL has failed, but I'm sure that someone on this list could definitively say one way or the other. -nld ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
