i dont expect leofs to provide performance levels which can be used in production to run vms off it
Am 6/14/2016 um 11:30 PM schrieb Will Beazley: > Does anyone have any info on when LeoFS is going to have their NFS > sharing sorted? > > I recall there was was an illumos project for an Federated Filesystem, > however, I went to join the project and it was gone! > (was it somewhere else?) > > Also, it was Acceptable in the 90s to use automounter and soft-links to > fake it. > > [Nineties], I've [n]ot the best, I'll take all I can get.... > > With regards to Automounter if you choose this route something like this > may work: > > /net/<host_mapped_alias>/<path_to_resource> > > Those aliases could be leveraged using NIS/LDAP?/DNS to dynamically do > something interesting using hashing or something I imagine but who knows > what and how far? > (Note: stale file handles USED to be an issue 15 years ago and there was > path length limit the bit folks a couple of times but this an EDA env so > it may not be an issue) > > It's been a while so I don't know how applicable it may be and I don't > even know for certain if it is available. > It was back then on HP-UX/Redhat/Solaris so if it isn't is may have been > excised. > > On 6/14/16 3:40 PM, David Preece wrote: >> Given the quantity of bandwidth available, how about exposing the >> individual drives as iSCSI targets then having a single machine expose >> the lot as an NFS share? >> >> Not that I've done this. Yet. >> >> -Dave >> >> On 15 June 2016 at 07:27, Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Distributed over 10Gbps dedicated local network, with multiple >> physical servers, allowing zones to have more storage than its >> physical server limit and, also, making zone's data more resilient >> to physical node failures without the need to constant snapshots >> and backups. >> >> Are there solutions that are compatible with SmartOS? >> >> >> 2016-06-14 12:58 GMT-03:00 InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >> Distribute - how? In term of a clusterfilesystem with >> distributed Locks >> and all the other great trouble-causing things? >> >> Am 6/14/2016 um 5:17 PM schrieb Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT: >> > Hello, SmartOS community! >> > >> > >> > My name is Paulo Coghi and I am an always learning server >> administrator. >> > >> > I would like to now if it is possible to run SmartOS's LX >> branded zones >> > within a distributed ZFS storage (distributed using multiple >> nodes), to >> > avoid the need to backup and restore zone data in case of a >> physical >> > node failure. >> > >> > My objective is to distribute the ZFS storage so no data >> migration is >> > needed when moving a zone between nodes. >> > *smartos-discuss* | Archives >> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now> >> > >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/26910370-9cc4a721> >> | >> > Modify >> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> >> > Your Subscription [Powered by Listbox] >> <http://www.listbox.com> >> > >> >> >> http://www.listbox.com >> >> >> > > *smartos-discuss* | Archives > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/26910370-9cc4a721> | > Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> > Your Subscription [Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
