On 8/12/16 1:10 , Ian Collins wrote:
> On 08/12/16 07:43 PM, Kilian Ries wrote:
>>   Hi Ian,
>>     are you running the nics standalone or in bonding mode?
>>     I had the same or a similar problem a while ago:
>>    
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02842.html
>>
>>     Unfortunately we didn't find a solution for the problem ...
>>   
> 
> It's just a single NIC which (I assume) is directly connected to a
> switch.  There's an identical box next to it in the rack running hyperv
> which works fine.
> 

I think these are likely related problems, which is getting close to
what Garrett said. One of the things we should probably look at is
updating the 5719/5720 to leverage the newer virtualization bits instead
of the legacy format that we're using.

Unfortunately we don't really have these handy, so we're not in a great
position to develop against this right now. I'm not sure how
straightforward a change that'd end up being.

Killian, sorry I had kind of dropped the ball on this. There is probably
a bit more debugging we can do on the driver here that'll require a bit
of custom stuff to go better dig into. Unfortunately I can't really
guarantee much of a prod-safe way on those next steps.

Ian, Killian, are any of these in a place where we could maybe put
together something which dumps some of the register space and you might
be able to run it? I can try putting together a one off module / command
or an updated platform / ioctl. Though again, testing this stuff is a
bit hard for me to do given hw.

Robert


-------------------------------------------
smartos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to