Please do not take anything I wrote in this mail as offensive: this was
not my intention.
no undue worries.
i know a lot of people who hate it and have their cellphones switched
to vibration first thing after powering on the first time.
This is the key: *after* the phone has been powering on the first time.
well, it was mostly a matter of phrasing -- most phones do not allow
disabling sounds before switched on (the treo 270, 600 and 650 have a
switch, so, technically, one has not to switch on the phone).
furthermore, the intended audience of debian/fso should be able to
What is "the intended audience"? I think you are a bit too naive here,
since you completely missed my point: not only because Debian does not
have an "intended audience" [a], but also because simply reading the
well, i think people installing debian on their fr (and that's the
audience i was speaking of, not debian in general) could be expected to
know what they do.
Please, no flame here, this discussion is about ringtones for the Debian
fso-frameworkd package.
right, i only try to make clear why i tink a recommendation is better then
a dependency.
However, to better document how to create a local configuration for the
ring- and message-tones, I just committed [i] . Please let me know if
anything there is not clear.
no offense intended, but how is the fiddling with u-a meant to be easier
compared to installing a recommendation?
i think i fail to grasp the whole idea of creating an additional
pacakge (with data not necessary only, maybe, useful) and then forcing
it upon the user.
I do not think I force someone to use these sounds
not using the sounds but installing the package.
However, since I am a kind of maniac for my Debian work and I do not
like leaving stuff undone, I already implemented fso-sounds-none [l].
now we're talking :-)
_______________________________________________
Smartphones-userland mailing list
Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland
