Hi,

Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 17:41 +0200 schrieb Luca Capello:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:13:36 +0200, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> >> I think we need to live with this situation every time new EFL snapshots
> >> are packaged, i.e. Zhone will be broken every once in a while.
> >
> > Thire is a workaround I believe.
> >
> > Entire stack with new ABI should be first uploaded to experimental, so 
> > things stay installable from unstable while things are in NEW.
> >
> > Once everything is out of NEW, an upload of everything to unstable should 
> > happen.
> 
> FWIW I would not like such a workflow, at least because:
> 
> 1) everyone are short in manpower
> 
> 2) you need to compile two times the packages for nothing
> 
> I think the easiest solution would be for Albin to work directly on an
> armel machine, does anyone want to gift him with a FR?  :-D

Actually, I think Nikita’s suggestion is interesting, and probably
better than forcing Albin (or his sponsor, for that sake :-)) to build
stuff on a slow machine. Buildd time is cheaper than developer time.

/me wonders if any policy is broken if the same source is uploaded to
unstable, by just changing the Distribution in the .changes files. It
might even avoid buildd runs :-))

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

_______________________________________________
Smartphones-userland mailing list
Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland

Reply via email to