Looks good. Just one comment.
--- svccfg.man1m.original Tue Jun 16 10:47:31 2009
+++ svccfg.man1m Fri Jun 19 16:53:08 2009
@@ -103,14 +103,20 @@
Service Profile Subcommands
apply file
- If file is a service profile, then service instances
- specified within the file are enabled or disabled
- according to it. See smf(5) for a description of service
- profiles. This command requires privileges to modify the
- "general/enabled" property of the service instances. See
- smf_security(5) for the privileges required to modify
- properties. If file is not a service profile, the sub-
- command fails.
+ If a file is a service profile, properties, including
+ general/enabled, which are specified in the file are
+ modified in the repository. Non-existing properties and
+ property groups will be created. The type of
+ pre-existing property groups will not be changed by the
+ profile. Existing properties can have their type
+ changed by the profile.
Why do we allow changing property type and not property group? I'd think
type is part of definition and not configuration. Is there a use case
where we'd want to override existing property type?
-tony
