Ethan, That was not planned but I wonder if a 'svccfg apply -n <profile>' that don't apply the profile, but returns a non-zero value in case of syntax error would suffice?
Thanks, Antonello Ethan Quach wrote: > > > Liane Praza wrote: >> Ethan Quach wrote: >>> Antonello, >>> >>> Is there a plan to provide a subcommand to validate an >>> SMF profile like is done with a manifest? >> >> Just to confirm, you're not talking about full template validation, >> just the "svccfg validate" that was available in S10 to ensure the >> syntax is correct. Right? > > Yes, I'm just asking about syntactical validation. > > > -ethan > > _______________________________________________ > smf-discuss mailing list > smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
