Strange, it should work, see CR 6184351 "action_authorization only works at the instance level".
Tim Foster wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm seeing something weird with inheritance of property group values > across instances, and I'm wondering if this is a bug in SMF? > > My service is composed of a service bundle, and a series of instances. > > The instances inherit most of their configuration from the parent bundle > (dependencies, start/stop methods, etc.) and I was hoping they would end > up being just an application property group, and not much more. > > - sources[1] at: > http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/jds/zfs-snapshot/src/var/svc/manifest/system/filesystem/ > > auto-snapshot.xml is the main service manifest, with > zfs-auto-snapshot*.xml declaring the instances. > > One thing I wanted to have, was the general/action_authorization > property value get specified in the main service instead of declaring it > for each instance. For some reason, when I do that without having that > property also set in the instance manifests, the zfssnap user gets > permission denied when trying to enable/disable the service. > > Is this pilot-error or a bug? Should the general property group get > inherited by instances too, or is it instance-specific? The application > property group I declare in the service manifest gets inherited ok by > the instances. > > cheers, > tim > > [1] I just pushed a change to make the instances explicitly declare the > general property group to work around the behaviour I'm seeing, but it > might take a while for the url above to get updated. > > _______________________________________________ > smf-discuss mailing list > smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
