On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 10:52 -0700, David Bustos wrote:
> Quoth Tim Foster on Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 02:28:07PM +0100:
> > One thing I wanted to have, was the general/action_authorization
> > property value get specified in the main service instead of declaring it
> > for each instance.
> value_authorization is needed to modify general/enabled, which permits
> persistent enable/disable. value_authorization is not inherited. It
> would be logical to think that the fix for 5105087 would have changed
> that, but it didn't. I don't remember why. I probably minimized
> inheritence to minimize security implications.
>
> It seems logical now, so file an RFE.
No problem - thanks for getting back to me - this is:
6755854 Undeclared general/action_authorization values in instances should be
inherited
cheers,
tim
