On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:00:54PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:45:30PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> > Nicolas Williams writes:
> > >
> > > I think there's a reasonable RFE here for lsvcrun to support scripts
> > > that aren't /bin/sh scripts. It should help you (and others, not least
> > > the third parties providing these scripts) in porting these startup
> > > scripts.
> >
> > I agree with having some mechanism to make it easier to import these
> > things directly into SMF. I see no point whatsoever in making it
> > "easy" to use them with /etc/rc*.d/ -- which is a legacy interface.
>
> Oh, I agree -- I wouldn't sign up for such an RFE, and probably noone
> else at Sun should either.
OK, I'm confused. How does that statement match up with "I think
there's a reasonable RFE here for lsvcrun to support scripts
that aren't /bin/sh scripts" ?
I honestly can't reconcile both of your statements above. Statement #1
seems to read "getting rid of lsvcrun -s is ok since it does nothing
apart from break non-/bin/sh scripts" (and the "fix" is as simple as
that, I think), while statement #2 says something different which I
don't follow.
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/smf-discuss/attachments/20080616/bef7d0ce/attachment.bin>
