On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:42:18PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> Ceri Davies writes:
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 03:24:26PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> > > cat >/etc/init.d/mything <<EOF
> > > #!/sbin/sh
> >
> > *bzzt!* /bin/sh, thank you, very much.
>
> bzzt, yourself. :-/
>
> /bin is just a symlink to /usr/bin, and if your script must run before
> /usr is mount (or must clean up after it has unmounted), then using
> /bin/sh is a mistake.
So I ask again, why doesn't SMF support using anything other than /bin/sh?
It's a bug, right?
> I've compiled all sorts of code, and rarely run into such cases among
> things that haven't been ported to Solaris yet. (And if it's
> advertised as having already been ported over, then you shouldn't have
> to do _anything_ special, including hacking up rc scripts.)
Blah, TSM, blah, Networker... Real world calling, sorry :)
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/smf-discuss/attachments/20080616/3b0ea4a1/attachment.bin>
