Sure. I'll take a look. tom
Liane Praza writes: > It'd be good to have someone who's been in svccfg more recently than I > look over this too. (Bustos? Tom?) > > Liane Praza wrote: > > Alan Maguire wrote: > >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~amaguire/svccfg_refresh/ > > > > I'll look at it this afternoon. > > (Alan updated this to do the svcadm refresh as we discussed too.) > > svccfg_help.c: > > nit. Not really an either/or. Maybe: "Update the Running snapshot > for the instance with the values from the current configuration. > If svccfg is not operating on an alternate repository, also inform > the restarter for the instance that the configuration has been > updated." > > Or, less accurate/less pedantic, but more helpful?: "Update the > Running snapshot for the instance with the values from the current > configuration. If svccfg is not operating on an alternate > repository, inform the restarter to invoke the instance's refresh > method." > > svccfg_libscf.c > > l12335: I'd think calling lscf_prep_hndl() would be more appropriate > than checking g_hndl. Is there a reason you didn't? > > I found the switch working for both the refresh_entity() and > take_snap() returns a little weird. At the least, it makes the > bad_error() a lie. > > liane > _______________________________________________ > smf-discuss mailing list > smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
