Alan Maguire wrote: > i figured sharing the switch might make sense since the > functions share most of the same return values, but i've > split it into two separate switch statements now.
Yeah, it was the error message that left me unconvinced, then further knowing that the set of return codes wasn't actually identical. > > thanks Liane (and Tom!) for taking a look. i've refreshed > the webrev, so let me know if there's anything else amiss. > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~amaguire/svccfg_refresh/ Looks great, Alan. Oh, and just so folks know, I've filed the ARC case for this work as 2008/015. The case has the same substance as the draft posted here yesterday, though some clarifications were made to the introductory material. liane
