> This doesn't make sense to me: dladm -t should mean muck with the > abstractions but do nothing to the saved smf configuration. > That's the equivalent of what it means now. Or to make another > analogy, it's like running ifconfig without changing /etc/hostname.XXX
Yes. But in the case where the dladm -t request conflicts with the SMF configuration, what happens? Should the service instance remain online and pay no mind to the fact that the configuration is now different from what it had configured? -- meem