Marcus Heine wrote: > thanks for the pointer to bug 6507754. > While I don't agree at all with the priority (4-low) this bug has been > given. I am glad to see this finally being worked.
The priority is basically irrelevant if someone's working on it full time. If it makes you feel better, you could raise it to a p3 (or maybe a p2), but that's not going to change the fact that someone's working on it full time -- it'll at most slow him down because more managers and program managers will ask him more frequently about status. :) > Will this be ready in time for nevada and/or s10u5, you think? I don't know about s10u5. We can look at the update schedule after it's in Nevada. (Anyone who wants to see this in an update should file an escalation. That's the best way to ensure we get the staffing necessary for a backport.) liane
