Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: >> (I'd like to completely eliminate the possibility of setting the two >> differently, but I suspect that some scenarios require it.) > > It's funny that the one thing I really would like to have: enable at > next boot, is currently not possible and not possible in the proposal > on the table either. Or is that such an unnatural thing to want.
+1 I have been wanting that one for a long time: 6239267 RFE: svcadm support for delayed execution of commands which was eventually closed as a dup of: 6198442 deferred enable/disable for svcadm and libscf g
