On Nov 9, 2007 5:28 AM, Rainer Heilke <rheilke at dragonhearth.com> wrote: > > Mark Martin wrote: > > Gang, > > > > I believe there's minimal consensus that start/stop as an alias for > > enable -t does have some value, if only for historical connotations. > > After re-reading the discussions here many times, I believe here's how > > I'd like to proceed. I'm going to assume that this is the correct > > approach unless someone tells me I will get veto'ed at RTI time. > > > > (continuing the list thinking meme) > > I will create a new svcadm start command which will an alias for enable -st > > I will create a new svcadm stop command which will be an alias for > > disable -st > > Thank you. If I understand the -s switch correctly from the man page, I > think this does capture my preferences. Others will have to confirm/deny > based upon their own wants.
I'm still unsure as to the -s bit. The reasoning is based on the observation that the wrappers around smf present in /etc/init.d generally just use the plain -t. I think I would expect that svcadm stop/start would behave the same way as running the old rc scripts with stop and start. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
