Casper.Dik at Sun.COM writes: > > > >That seems fine, but the existing practice for SMF is to give the > >service a name that's meaningful to humans -- not just a copy of the > >name of the daemon that happens to implement the service. > > > Unfortunately. they weren't all picked very carefully: > > dhcp-server > nfs/server
Agreed; there are deeper naming problems here, some of which were noted during Greenline ARC review. I don't so how that really affects this particular service, though. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
