James Carlson wrote: > Dan Groves writes: >> Sebastien Roy wrote: >>> Dan Groves wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I posted a new link ID management API document. It includes changes >>>> for comments received so far, plus a name change of the new service >>>> from network/linkmgmtd to network/dladmd >>> Hmm, I'm still not enamored by that name. How about >>> network/link-management? >>> >>> -Seb >> I could do that (I agree that it is a better name). I vaguely remember >> Meem mentioning to me a existing practice for naming daemons that >> command line tools interact with, which was you add a "d" to the name of >> the command to get the daemon. > > That seems fine, but the existing practice for SMF is to give the > service a name that's meaningful to humans -- not just a copy of the > name of the daemon that happens to implement the service. >
Good point. As far as I know, we're still not wedded to a name. If that's true, and there's no objections, I'll change the name in the documents. thanks, Dan
