-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re:[smf-discuss] Re: differences in smf services in update 3 65484218 From: Michael Wahlberg <michael.wahlb...@sun.com> To: David Finberg <David.Finberg at Sun.COM> Cc: Claire.Grandalski at Sun.COM, s10-users at sun.com, smf-discuss at opensolaris.org Date: Thu Jun 14 2007 17:43:54 GMT+0200 (MEST)
> Dave, > > I took a look at that bug, and I am not quite sure > it is the same thing. I don't see in the bug were this > is Sol10 U3 (11/06). Our customer has disabled > rpc/bind and inetd on previous Sol10 release and > they still booted multi-user. They only see this issue > in U3. > > Also what does require_all and optional_all mean? > If I do a svcs -l svc:/milestone/multi-user:default > It states inetd and rpc are optional_all. Doesn't this > mean you don't need them for multi-user? yes and that's what 6469233 is suppose to fix under certain situation. why don't you have the customer apply the patch for 6469233 and let us know the result ? -- Renaud > > Thanks, > Mike > > > David Finberg wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Michael Wahlberg wrote: >> >>> Fowarding to SMF also.... >> >> >> >>>> Hi, >>>> I have a customer is using solaris 10 11/06 (update 3) and he >>>> shuts off >>>> rpcbind & inetd and he is unable to get into multiuser mode. >>>> Although he >>>> states that previous versions of solaris 10 when he shuts the same >>>> services off he can get into mulituser mode. Can you tell me what >>>> changes >>>> have been made in update 3? Is there a list of required & unrequired >>>> dependecies? >>> >> >> Sounds like 6469233 >> >> -- Dave > > >
