Darren Reed wrote: ... > > Personally, I don't care if the service is still doing > its start method or something else. If disable (and -t) > are the only proper hooks to stop a service then that > is what I expect it to do, not futz around and pretend. >
Did you try "-s" on svcadm (clearly you didn't in the script, but outside of it)? That should get you closer to what you're looking for in terms of failure semantics. Dave
