On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:29:20PM -0700, David Bustos wrote: > Quoth Darren Reed on Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 10:18:30PM +0800: > > Maybe what should be said here is that SMF isn't trying hard > > enough to disable a service. I didn't dig into the why it doesn't > > try harder. Is it waiting for it to become "online" (properly) so > > it can then "offline" it? I hope not. > > That's exactly what it's doing. I don't recall whether there's a good > reason for it. File a bug.
Sounds like an option for disabling with prejudice is needed.
