After more investigation, moving filesystem/local to single-user milestone is not an option when Sun Cluster or Sun Storagetek AVS comes into play.
-- Renaud Narendra Kumar S.S wrote: > Jordan, > > Is there any particular reason, why you are not proposing to move > filesystem/local to single-user milestone. > That looks very simple fix and will solve all the problems. > > Regards, > Narendra > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Jordan Brown <Jordan.Brown at sun.com > <mailto:Jordan.Brown at sun.com>> wrote: > > Jordan Brown wrote: > > Proposal 2: > > - Make the new patching service depend on system/filesystem/local. > > - Modify patchadd to temporarily enable system/filesystem/local > before > > patching, and disable it afterward, *if* it is offline. Note > that when > > the patching service runs, system/filesystem/local will be online > and so > > patchadd will not need to manipulate it. > > I added part of this late and it's a little misleading. It suggests > that patchadd wouldn't need to manipulate s/f/l, and that's not quite > right. *When invoked from the patch service*, patchadd wouldn't need to > manipulate s/f/l. When invoked interactively (from > milestone/single-user), in this scenario patchadd would still have to > enable s/f/l. > _______________________________________________ > smf-discuss mailing list > smf-discuss at opensolaris.org <mailto:smf-discuss at opensolaris.org> > > > > > -- > Warm Regards, > Narendra > > Visit my blogs at: > http://ssnarendrakumar.blogspot.com/ > ___ ___ __ _ > / __/ / __/ / | / / > _\ \ _ \ \ / /| |/ / > \___/ \___/ /_/ |__/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > smf-discuss mailing list > smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
