Jordan,
Is there any particular reason, why you are not proposing to move
filesystem/local to single-user milestone.
That looks very simple fix and will solve all the problems.
Regards,
Narendra
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Jordan Brown <Jordan.Brown at sun.com> wrote:
> Jordan Brown wrote:
> > Proposal 2:
> > - Make the new patching service depend on system/filesystem/local.
> > - Modify patchadd to temporarily enable system/filesystem/local before
> > patching, and disable it afterward, *if* it is offline. Note that when
> > the patching service runs, system/filesystem/local will be online and so
> > patchadd will not need to manipulate it.
>
> I added part of this late and it's a little misleading. It suggests
> that patchadd wouldn't need to manipulate s/f/l, and that's not quite
> right. *When invoked from the patch service*, patchadd wouldn't need to
> manipulate s/f/l. When invoked interactively (from
> milestone/single-user), in this scenario patchadd would still have to
> enable s/f/l.
> _______________________________________________
> smf-discuss mailing list
> smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
--
Warm Regards,
Narendra
Visit my blogs at:
http://ssnarendrakumar.blogspot.com/
___ ___ __ _
/ __/ / __/ / | / /
_\ \ _ \ \ / /| |/ /
\___/ \___/ /_/ |__/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/smf-discuss/attachments/20080901/239eb0d4/attachment.html>
