On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Liane Praza <liane.praza at sun.com> wrote: > We're seriously considering changing the behaviour of r.manifest when it > is invoked on an enabled (and running) service to simply do "svcadm > disable -s; svccfg delete", rather than failing with an error and > forcing the administrator to type svcadm disable before removing the > package.
Absolutely, I'm all in favour. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
