Peter Tribble wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Liane Praza <liane.praza at sun.com> wrote: >> We're seriously considering changing the behaviour of r.manifest when it >> is invoked on an enabled (and running) service to simply do "svcadm >> disable -s; svccfg delete", rather than failing with an error and >> forcing the administrator to type svcadm disable before removing the >> package. > > Absolutely, I'm all in favour. >
Thanks to you, Jordan, and Norm for the feedback. The confirmation is greatly appreciated, and barring any unresolvable problems, I think we'll be going in this direction. liane
