I'm going to combine a few parts of the mail trail here to sum up the remaining questions.
Nils, you do have the necessary +1s to start this project. Please let me know if you'd like to make any adjustments to your project proposal based on the collected comments below. I wrote: > Nils, would you like your own mailing list for this project? (I'd think > it is appropriate, as you're likely to have interested folks who aren't > interested in all the day-to-day stuff of smf-discuss.) Stephen Hahn wrote: > * Nils Goroll <slink at mcs.de> [2008-02-07 19:01]: >> > Suggested Project name (with a bit of self-irony): Everest >> > >> > Suggested Project name for those who don't like this kind of >> > humor: smf-mount > > Although I have a sense of humour, having just had to point people > manually to the code-named projects from name services (all named > after towns in the state of Nevada), I would prefer the latter name. David Bustos wrote: > It seems likely to me that the project > will end up allowing administrators to create dependencies on mount > points, so the description should either list it as a problem to be > solved, or at least say that it will be investigated. David and I both suggested contacting the storage community as well. After a response from you with any modifications, I'll contact the appropriate OGB representatives to get you set up. liane
