* Jordan Brown (Sun) <opensolaris at jordan.maileater.net> [2008-04-07 19:47]: > Steve Peng wrote: > > I am proposing that we deliver /var/svc/manifest tree as > > it is now which > > allows 3rd parties to deliver their manifests into /var and have the 2nd > > step of import > > create link for each manifest under /etc to address the backward > > compatibility concern. > > Who will delete these symlinks when the 3rd party service is removed?
Good question. Why would a forest of symlinks be better than a single directory symlink (/var/svc/manifest -> /etc/svc/manifest) or a layer just under that? - Stephen -- sch at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
