> Yes.  However, since none of the existing such decisions in configd
> are generating audit events, I'd prefer that audit records be
> introduced for reads at the same time they're introduced for
> modifications.

        This is a bug.
        5079356 Framework should provide administrative audit trail/history
        6405683 svc.configd audit events need to be defined.
        I don't mean to imply that this project's putback be delayed
        until the bug is fixed.  Just that this project is responsible
        for generating an appropriate audit record as part of the
        bug fix.  Ordering is a management issue not an architectural one.
        The archictural point is that an audit record is required for
        this project.

Gary..

Reply via email to