> Yes. However, since none of the existing such decisions in configd > are generating audit events, I'd prefer that audit records be > introduced for reads at the same time they're introduced for > modifications.
This is a bug. 5079356 Framework should provide administrative audit trail/history 6405683 svc.configd audit events need to be defined. I don't mean to imply that this project's putback be delayed until the bug is fixed. Just that this project is responsible for generating an appropriate audit record as part of the bug fix. Ordering is a management issue not an architectural one. The archictural point is that an audit record is required for this project. Gary..