> >     AUE_smf_read_prop, subject, uauth, frmi, type, return?
> >     Or something else?
> > 
> > Gary..
> 
> Those values look good to me.  Keith in a separate mail suggests that type
> is not needed because the property value is neither being created or
> modified.  That sounds reasonable to me, unless you have some security
> related reason for logging the type.

        I don't have an issue not including type.  I wasn't sure if it
        was required to distinguish the property.  Keith asserts that
        the FMRI is unique without the type.  I presume that's true and
        have no reason to believe type is required.

Gary..

Reply via email to