> > AUE_smf_read_prop, subject, uauth, frmi, type, return? > > Or something else? > > > > Gary.. > > Those values look good to me. Keith in a separate mail suggests that type > is not needed because the property value is neither being created or > modified. That sounds reasonable to me, unless you have some security > related reason for logging the type.
I don't have an issue not including type. I wasn't sure if it was required to distinguish the property. Keith asserts that the FMRI is unique without the type. I presume that's true and have no reason to believe type is required. Gary..