On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:04:31PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > > > But this doesn't mean that you can't have one service -- the > > > transient-ness issue would force you to have more than one service. > > > That's one thing I'm getting at. > > > > I see. I think that's really an implementation detail. > > FMRIs are interfaces, unless in this case the routeadm command is > intended to be the only Committed interface for managing > forwarding/routing state and the FMRIs themselve Project Private, then > I'd expect the FMRIs to be Commited also. > > Maybe that's the answer: the FMRIs in question should be Project Private > because routeadm is the public interface. In that case I don't mind the > split forwarding/routing split at all.
Hmmm, but then, one couldn't use SMF profiles to "hammer" forwarding/routing off.
