Alan Maguire wrote: > svc:/network/routing/ipv4-routing > svc:/network/routing/ipv6-routing > svc:/network/routing/ipv4-forwarding > svc:/network/routing/ipv6-forwarding
First I like that you have svc:/network/routing/ I'm not sure I like that the word routing is repeated again later, why not have: svc:/network/routing:ipv4 svc:/network/routing:ipv6 or if you want to use instances for something else (though I wonder what that would be). svc:/network/routing/ipv4 svc:/network/routing/ipv6 Why is forwarding "under" routing shouldn't it be: svc:/network/forwarding/ipv4 svc:/network/forwarding/ipv6 or if there is no need for alternate instances: svc:/network/forwarding:ipv4 svc:/network/forwarding:ipv6 -- Darren J Moffat
