ok, good to know the refresh worked.

I think this issue was fixed by a patch in s10.
Since the system is running Update 3, it is worth upgrading.

-- Renaud

Antonello Cruz wrote:
> Renaud,
> 
> Karl did a
> 
>    svcadm refresh svc:/application/SUNWappserver/domain1:default
> 
> and got rid of the dependency. I replied to him earlier but did not use 
> reply all by mistake. I should have re-sent the reply when I realized my 
> mistake. I am quoting it below.
> 
> Thanks for looking into this,
> 
> Antonello
> 
> 
> 
> Antonello Cruz wrote:
>> try
>>
>> svcadm refresh svc:/application/SUNWappserver/domain1:default
>>
>> But that's just a guess
>>
>> Antonello
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Renaud Manus wrote:
>> What is the service that defines the dependency (SUNWappserver/domain1 
>> or network/messaging_server) ?
>>
>> Does the dependency go away when you refresh 
>> SUNWappserver/domain1:default  ?
>>
>> -- Renaud
>>
>> Karl Rossing a ?crit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is an S10U3 box.
>>>
>>> bash-3.00# svccfg -s svc:/application/SUNWappserver/domain1:default 
>>> listpg
>>> network           dependency
>>> filesystem-local  dependency
>>> general           framework
>>> restarter         framework     NONPERSISTENT
>>>
>>> bash-3.00# svcs -l svc:/application/SUNWappserver/domain1:default
>>> fmri         svc:/application/SUNWappserver/domain1:default
>>> name         Appserver Domain Administration Server
>>> enabled      false
>>> state        disabled
>>> next_state   none
>>> state_time   Tue Aug 25 01:18:42 2009
>>> restarter    svc:/system/svc/restarter:default
>>> dependency   require_all/none svc:/milestone/network:default (online)
>>> dependency   require_all/none svc:/system/filesystem/local:default 
>>> (online)
>>> dependency   require_all/none svc:/network/messaging_server:default 
>>> (absent)
>>>
>>> I deleted the "svc:/network/messaging_server:default" service but the 
>>> dependency is still there.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Karl
>>>   
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> smf-discuss mailing list
>> smf-discuss at opensolaris.org

Reply via email to