Alan Maguire wrote: > hi Tony > > On 05/02/2010 22:21, Tony Nguyen wrote: >> We completed testing and fixed all found bugs. We'd appreciate >> feedback by Feb 19th as that would allow us to turnaround comments >> and still make the scheduled integration date. >> > sorry I'm a bit late. One thought I had - we've been > doing a lot of boot-time testing and the routing-setup > service starts quite late, seemingly due to it's dependency > on manifest-import. If EMI runs before any other services, > we can remove that dependency. Now I'm not sure if > this falls into the scope of initial integration, but it > just occurred to me it might help boot-time a bit. Thanks! > > Alan > Hi Alan,
Right, we can eliminate the dependency on manifest-import for routing-setup service. Though it's a simple change, we're concerned with the additional test implications since we're on a tight schedule. I can file an RFE and make the change once we integrate EMI. Does that sound reasonable? Thanks for pointing this out. -tn >> Webrev: >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tonyn/EMI_webrev/ >> >> Design Doc: >> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/download/Community+Group+smf/smf_design_docs/emidesign.html >> >> >> >> The number of modified files dramatically decreased since changes to >> SVR4 packages are obsoleted. Susan and Jean, would you mind review >> the IPS packaging changes and the Makefiles? >> >> Antonello and Liane, you guys still have the SMF changes :) >> >> Thanks in advance for your help, >> -tn >> >> On 11/28/09 01:02 AM, Tony Nguyen wrote: >>> Here's the long awaited webrev for Early Manifest Import. Relevant >>> pointers are: >>> >>> Design Doc: >>> http://caolila.sfbay:82/~tn143363/webrevs/EMI/emi_webrev_onnv_files/ >>> >>> ON IPS packaging webrev: >>> http://caolila.sfbay:82/~tn143363/webrevs/EMI/emi_webrev_onnv_files/ >>> >>> ONNV webrev: >>> http://caolila.sfbay:82/~tn143363/webrevs/EMI/emi_webrev_on_ips_files/ >>> >>> cscope repository: >>> /net/kodiak.sfbay/builds/swilcox/EMI_ips_gate/usr/src >>> >>> Since the number of affected files is quite large, we decided to break >>> the changes into two sets, packaging changes and SMF changes, with the >>> following assignment to keep things manageable. >>> >>> Jean and Susan, would you mind review the ON IPS packaging files in the >>> first webrev pointer as well as the SVR4 packaging files in the ONNV >>> webrev? Of course, any additional comments on the SMF code would be >>> welcome and appreciated. >>> >>> Antonello and Liane, would you mind review the SMF changes in the ONNV >>> webrev link? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> smf-discuss mailing list >> smf-discuss at opensolaris.org >
