SMS messages do not have extensible "header" fields. If this is to be implemented by the library, it would take space from the normal message area. This would either cut useful characters from the end application or would increase the message parts needed for a message.
I don't think that this is something that SMSLib should implement. A low level library should not make assumptions - such assumptions are better suited to be placed in upper levels. On Mar 17, 9:44 am, Xodox <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been wondering about this too. > > I find it very odd that SMS doesnt seem to have a 'In-reply-to' > identification > as fx. mails have. This tiny bit of information would make it much > easier > to make 2-way email-sms conversion using only a single modem. > > -Michael > > On Mar 17, 3:33 am, MT <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > I need to send a message with an ID for each message so that a > > received message can be related to a sent message, and separated from > > non-relevant messages by my software. It is a bit like sending a > > request as text and identifying the response. > > > I have tried the sendId method, but the matching getId does not > > contain the Id sent. Is this a function of the phone and/or network? > > > Any suggestions? > > > Thanks > > MT --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SMSLib User Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SMSLib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
