I try that step, but still not fixing my problem. Seems there is too many
0xff of the binary dump result.

The correct one should be like this:
2670025D000201000211429312FF6CBD6F0AF566100011429317FF6CBD6F0AF56610001142931AFF6CBD6F0AF56610001142931DFF6CBD6D0AF566100011429328FF6CBD690AF56610001142932CFF6CBD690AF566100011429333FF6CBD660AF566100011429336FF6CBD690AF566100011429339FF6CBD690AF56610001142933CFF6CBD6F0AF566100000

But SMSLib result is:
267014b021011178d36ffffffff636fffffffc4b833ffffffd001178effffffa2ffffffff636fffffffafb8343001178fffffffffffffffff636fffffffa6b8342001178105ffffffff636fffffffa9b834200117810cffffffff636fffffffacb83420011781012ffffffff636fffffffafb83420011781018ffffffff636fffffffb2b83430011781021ffffffff636fffffffb2b83430011781027ffffffff636fffffffb2b8343001178102dffffffff636fffffffb5b8343000

Hope someone can give the clue. Thanks.


Aryo Sanjaya
http://facebook.aryosanjaya.net


On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 01:39, Thanasis <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I must say that Jason's discovery is a pretty good one!
>
> One of my test phones is the old (but trusty) Nokia 6310i. Lately, I
> am experimenting with encrypted messages. I use binary messages for
> this purpose. Those binaries were sent correctly from my phone, but
> they were not received correctly. They appeared like flash messages
> and they were never saved in the INBOX.
>
> Amazingly enough, after reading this post I also removed the
> GROUP_DATA field and guess what... I can now send AND receive binaries
> perfectly.
> I don't know which method is the right one (we must do our reading, I
> guess), but this change solved my problem as well.
>
> On Apr 16, 9:36 am, Jeff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Sounds like something specific with your modem. I usually use binary
> > sending with back and forth with j2me midlets.  The phones I've tested
> > against send binary messages with 0xF at the start, so thats the
> > behaviour I copied.
> >
> > On Apr 16, 5:38 am, Jason <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I'm using 2 Enfora Enabler-II G Modems on COM1 and COM2,
> > > respectively.  When I use the SendMessage and ReadMessage examples,
> > > I've encountered some really strange behavior trying to send a PDU
> > > using OutboundBinaryMessage.  The message says it was sent
> > > successfully, but never shows up.  I compared the PDU byte array
> > > generated from SMS lib by the bytes that I use in a terminal to use AT
> > > commands to send the exact same message.  There was one difference
> > > between the way I've historically sent the command and the way SMSLib
> > > was sending the command:
> >
> > > My way read 0004 after the phone number octets
> > > SMS lib read 00F4 after the phone number octets.
> >
> > > Strangely, if I go into Pdu.java and comment out the or of
> > > DCS_CODING_GROU_DATA, like this, the ReadMessage example gets my PDU
> > > successfully.
> >
> > > public void setDataBytes(byte[] dataBytes)
> > > {
> > >                 this.dataBytes = dataBytes;
> > >                 this.decodedText = null;
> > >                 // clear the encoding bits for this field 8-bit/data
> > >                 this.dataCodingScheme &= PduUtils.DCS_ENCODING_MASK;
> > >                 this.dataCodingScheme |= PduUtils.DCS_ENCODING_8BIT;
> > > //              this.dataCodingScheme |=
> PduUtils.DCS_CODING_GROUP_DATA;
> > >         }
> >
> > > So my question is this-- why would commenting out the
> > > DCS_CODING_GROUP_DATA line result in me being able to receive my 8-bit
> > > binary PDU message, whereas with it uncommented I don't?  Is this a
> > > bug in the library, a unique "feature" of my modems, or outright user
> > > error?
> >
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > > Jason
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SMSLib User Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SMSLib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to