I tried both the trials for lightroom and apperture when they first came out. They both had very similar features, but I plumped for Lightroom in the end, becuase I found I could work through a series of photos quicker with that program than with apperture. I still use iPhoto to catalog everything, but i export TIFs in lightroom to take to the printers, and I backup the original NEF files to dvd to archive them. Apperture wants to be your one stop shop, and I think Lightroom is more flexible to different workflows. This was using the first versions of each software and I haven't upgraded yet.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Derek Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lightroom 2 has added support for dual displays. > Derek > > On 8 Oct 2008, at 18:58, Sam - MacAmbulance wrote: > > > Aperture is great value for what you get, I use it exclusively for > > my photography because it supports dual displays, which Lightroom > > does not. > > > > Regards > > > > Sam > > > > providing affordable Apple & PC services > > Sam Mullen > > 07747 778022 > > http://www.macambulance.co.uk > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
