Thanks for the views. Think I'll probably go for the Open Office as I'm trying to coax someone to update from Office 2000 in Windoze.
Malcolm On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:08 AM, tcrooks <[email protected]> wrote: > > Until OO 3.0 appeared I had used Neo Office as an alternative to the > MS original. I'd suggest that, for those most familiar with MS Office > for Windows, OO 3.0 provides an easier transition but I can't comment > on charts an anti-aliasing. Of course, iWorks might well trump both in > terms of attractive charts but would they survive transition back to > Windows is another matter. > > On 14 Sep, 13:24, Malcolm Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I'm thinking of trying out an Open Office suite. It appears that Open > > Office for Mac and Neo Office both make claims about being the best for > Mac. > > I'm particularly interested in the anti-aliasing developments for more > > attractive charts, probably ultimately for sending to a Windoze > environment. > > > > Has anyone compared recent versions and come to any conclusions? > > > > Malcolm > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
