With Virtualbox being pretty much useless right now on the new macbook pros [1] I find myself in need of paid for virtualisation.
Is there any consensus on which of the two is better? Will be using it mainly for a Windows VM (just for testing software) and running a couple of Linux machines. I used Parallels a few years ago and it seemed pretty decent but have used neither of the mac based products for ages. Not really bothered about coherence mode or any of that, just need the fastest most stable one really. [1] http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/8474 -- *Paul Howard* web: phoward.com | twitter: @phowardcom <http://twitter.com/phowardcom> tel (UK): +44 (0)1293 738158 | mobile (UK): +44 (0)7903 505153 | tel (US) : +1 251 243 0058 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB.
