|
Just spotted (via a promo email) that Parallels is 'Deal of the
Week' at Amazon and is £29.97 (54% off). Don't know how that compares to buying direct or from elsewhere. ... Graham on 07/04/2011 16:06 Graham Street sent the following: Never tried VMF. I run Parallels on both a Mac Pro (7Gb) and MacBookPro (2Gb). Been through a few versions and I'm now on version 6, the latest. Have no issues with it and it works fine for me. On the MBP, its a bit slow but that's lack of memory and the MBP is the original slowest spec and can't be upgraded. On the Mac Pro, I run Parallels at the same time as everything else and with both WinXP and W7 windows open for software testing.-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB. |
- [sussex_mug] Vmware fusion or Parallels? Paul Howard
- Re: [sussex_mug] Vmware fusion or Parallels? Rob Beattie
- Re: [sussex_mug] Vmware fusion or Parallels? Graham Street
- Re: [sussex_mug] Vmware fusion or Parallels? Keith Scott
- Re: [sussex_mug] Vmware fusion or Parallels? Graham Street
- Re: [sussex_mug] Vmware fusion or Parallels? Paul Howard
- Re: [sussex_mug] Vmware fusion or Parallels? Simon Atkinson
- Re: [sussex_mug] Vmware fusion or Parallels? Paul Russell
