Strange.. my email client just did something silly and discarded my
message. Trying again:

Yeah, devicecraft is a good name but also awkward to type, and makes
snapcraft less interesting as you point out.

The fragmentation seems justified as the subjects are quite unrelated.
Mixing makes a bad experience on both ends.



On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer <
gustavo.nieme...@canonical.com> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Oliver Grawert <o...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
>> hi,
>> On Do, 2016-09-08 at 09:25 -0300, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
>> >
>> > Alright, I'm moving ahead with this.
>> >
>> > My proposal is devicecr...@lists.snapcraft.io. If you don't like it
>> > please speak up soon. :)
>> >
>> how about just "devices@" ... this feels all like redhats "*kit"
>> initiative from a few years ago (device-kit, console-kit ... foo-kit,
>> bar-kit)
>>
>> also, currently we dont really have many device related incoming
>> questions on this list, does it really already justify the
>> fragmentation as long as the throughput is that low ?
>>
>> ciao
>>         oli
>> --
>> Snapcraft mailing list
>> Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
>> an/listinfo/snapcraft
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net
>



-- 
gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net
-- 
Snapcraft mailing list
Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft

Reply via email to