The newest images seem to present the same issue still. Any chance/intention of fixing this?
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> wrote: > 4GiB would actually be 300MiB *over* 4*10^9 bytes, so the image is already > discounting that. The device I have is ~3.98*10^9 bytes. > > On Feb 13, 2015 1:03 AM, "Gustavo Niemeyer" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 4GiB would actually be 300MiB *over* 4*10^9 bytes, so the image is already >> discounting that. The device I have is ~3.98*10^9 bytes. >> >> On Feb 13, 2015 12:25 AM, "Joe Talbott" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:58:43PM -0200, Sergio Schvezov wrote: >>> > On jueves 12 de febrero de 2015 22h'25:51 BRST, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: >>> > >Hey all, >>> > > >>> > >It would be good to reduce the snappy image size just a little bit. >>> > >I have a Kingston MicroSD card that self-reports as 4GB, but it >>> > >is not large enough to hold the image. I had to take a few MB >>> > >out from the last partition to make it work. >>> > >>> > I totally agree! I just haven't figured out what a "bit" is; I guess >>> > I we can be on the safe side and say 4GB is going to 3.9GB (-100MB >>> > to be on the safe side given the plethora of devices). >>> > >>> > Is that a good number? >>> > >>> > Ogra, you gave me a long explanation on variation; is +/-100MB a >>> > good σ expected on the population of sdcards around? >>> >>> It's my understanding that a lot of storage manufacturers use 1000 as >>> the number of bits per kilobyte rather than 1024. I'd think -300MB would >>> suffice as that's roughly the difference between the two. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> -- >>> snappy-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel -- gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net -- snappy-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
